JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 26, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Buendia Pineda Ricaurte·Respondent Universidad Del Valle Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Universidad del Valle, a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Tercero de Familia de Cali, toda vez que se aplicó lo dispuesto en el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000, norma manifiestamente contraria a la Carta Política.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al citado para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela interpuesta por Ricaurte Buendia Otalora contra la Universidad del Valle, a partir del auto de 31 de agosto de 2000, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. de Familia de Cali.
  3. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria al Juzgado
  4. Tercero. de Familia de Cali, para que de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.